THAI CHI CHUAN

Today, t‘ai-chi ch‘üan has spread worldwide. Most modern styles of t‘ai-chi ch‘üan trace their development to at least one of the five traditional schools: Chen, Yang, Wu (Hao), Wu, and Sun. All of the former, in turn, trace their historical origins to Chen Village.
Overview
The concept of the taiji (“supreme ultimate”), in contrast with wuji (“without ultimate”), appears in both Taoist and Confucian Chinese philosophy, where it represents the fusion or mother of yin and yang into a single ultimate, represented by the taijitu symbol . T‘ai-chi ch‘üan theory and practice evolved in agreement with many Chinese philosophical principles, including those of Taoism and Confucianism.
T‘ai-chi ch‘üan training involves five elements, taolu (solo hand and weapons routines/forms), neigong and qigong (breathing, movement and awareness exercises and meditation), tuishou (response drills) and sanshou (self defence techniques). While t‘ai-chi ch‘üan is typified by some for its slow movements, many t‘ai-chi styles (including the three most popular—Yang, Wu and Chen) have secondary forms with faster pace. Some traditional schools of t‘ai-chi teach partner exercises known as tuishou (pushing hands), and martial applications of the postures of different forms (taolu).
In China, t‘ai-chi ch‘üan is categorized under the Wudang grouping of Chinese martial arts—that is, the arts applied with internal power. Although the term Wudang suggests these arts originated in the Wudang Mountains, it is simply used to distinguish the skills, theories and applications of neijia (internal arts) from those of the Shaolin grouping, or waijia (hard or external) styles.
Since the earliest widespread promotion of the health benefits of t‘ai-chi ch‘üan, by Yang Shaohou, Yang Chengfu, Wu Chien-ch‘üan and Sun Lutang in the early 20th century, it has developed a worldwide following of people, often with little or no interest in martial training, for its benefit to personal health. Medical studies of t‘ai-chi support its effectiveness as an alternative exercise and a form of martial arts therapy.
It is purported that focusing the mind solely on the movements of the form helps to bring about a state of mental calm and clarity. Besides general health benefits and stress management attributed to t‘ai-chi ch‘üan training, aspects of traditional Chinese medicine are taught to advanced t‘ai-chi ch‘üan students in some traditional schools.
Some other forms of martial arts require students to wear a uniform during practice. In general, t‘ai-chi ch‘üan schools do not require a uniform, but both traditional and modern teachers often advocate loose, comfortable clothing and flat-soled shoes.
The physical techniques of t‘ai-chi ch‘üan are described in the “T‘ai-chi classics,” a set of writings by traditional masters, as being characterized by the use of leverage through the joints based on coordination and relaxation, rather than muscular tension, in order to neutralize, yield or initiate attacks. The slow, repetitive work involved in the process of learning how that leverage is generated gently and measurably increases, opens the internal circulation (breath, body heat, blood, lymph, peristalsis, etc.).
The study of t‘ai-chi ch‘üan primarily involves three aspects:
- Health: An unhealthy or otherwise uncomfortable person may find it difficult to meditate to a state of calmness or to use t‘ai-chi ch‘üan as a martial art. T‘ai-chi ch‘üan’s health training, therefore, concentrates on relieving the physical effects of stress on the body and mind. For those focused on t‘ai-chi ch‘üan’s martial application, good physical fitness is an important step towards effective self-defense.
- Meditation: The focus and calmness cultivated by the meditative aspect of t‘ai-chi ch‘üan is seen as necessary in maintaining optimum health (in the sense of relieving stress and maintaining homeostasis) and in application of the form as a soft style martial art.
- Martial art: The ability to use t‘ai-chi ch‘üan as a form of self-defense in combat is the test of a student’s understanding of the art. T‘ai-chi ch‘üan is the study of appropriate change in response to outside forces, the study of yielding and “sticking” to an incoming attack rather than attempting to meet it with opposing force. The use of t‘ai-chi ch‘üan as a martial art is quite challenging and requires a great deal of training.
Name
The names T‘ai-chi ch‘üan and Taiji quan are two different transcriptions of three Chinese characters that are the written Chinese name for the artform:
Characters | Wade–Giles | Pinyin | Meaning |
---|---|---|---|
太極 | t‘ai chi | tàijí | the source, the beginning |
拳 | ch‘üan | quán | fist, boxing |
Despite the one Chinese spelling, 太極拳, there are two different spellings in the English usage, one derived from the Wade–Giles and the other from the Pinyin transcription, with the West being most familiar with the Wade–Giles: t‘ai-chi ch‘üan. Westerners often shorten this name to t‘ai chi (often omitting the aspirate sign—thus becoming “tai chi”). This shortened name is the same as that of the t‘ai-chi philosophy, sometimes causing confusion of the two. The chi in the name of the martial art may also be mistaken for ch‘i, (qi — 氣) the “life force,” especially as ch‘i is involved in the practice of t‘ai-chi ch‘üan. The Wade-Giles form and its variations remain the most popular spelling today; however, most Chinese, including many professional practitioners, masters, and martial arts bodies (such as the IWUF), use the Pinyin.
Historical origin
From a modern historical perspective, when tracing t‘ai-chi ch‘üan’s formative influences to Taoist and Buddhist monasteries, there seems little more to go on than legendary tales. Nevertheless, some traditional schools claim that t‘ai-chi ch‘üan has a practical connection to and dependence upon the theories of Song dynasty Neo-Confucianism (a conscious synthesis of Taoist, Buddhist, and Confucian traditions, especially the teachings of Mencius). These schools believe that t‘ai-chi ch‘üan’s theories and practice were formulated by the Taoist monk Zhang Sanfeng in the 12th century, at about the same time that the principles of the Neo-Confucian school were making themselves felt in Chinese intellectual life. However, modern research casts serious doubts on the validity of those claims, pointing out that a 17th-century piece called “Epitaph for Wang Zhengnan” (1669), composed by Huang Zongxi (A.D. 1610–1695), is the earliest reference indicating any connection between Zhang Sanfeng and martial arts whatsoever, and must not be taken literally but must be understood as a political metaphor instead. Claims of connections between t‘ai-chi ch‘üan and Zhang Sanfeng appeared no earlier than the 19th century.
History records that Yang Luchan trained with the Chen family for 18 years before he started to teach the art in Beijing, which strongly suggests that his art was based on, or heavily influenced by, the Chen family art. The Chen family are able to trace the development of their art back to Chen Wangting in the 17th century. Martial arts historian Xu Zhen believed that the Taiji of Chen Village had been influenced by the Taizu changquan style practiced at the nearby Shaolin Monastery, while Tang Hao thought it was derived from a treatise by the Ming dynasty general Qi Jiguang, Jixiao Xinshu (New Treatise on Military Efficiency), which discussed several martial arts styles including Taizu changquan.
What is now known as “t‘ai-chi ch‘üan” appears to have received this appellation from only around the mid-1800s. A scholar in the Imperial Court by the name of Ong Tong He witnessed a demonstration by Yang Luchan at a time before Yang had established his reputation as a teacher. Afterwards Ong wrote: “Hands holding Taiji shakes the whole world, a chest containing ultimate skill defeats a gathering of heroes.” Before this time the art may have had a number of different names, and appears to have been generically described by outsiders as zhan quan (沾拳, touch boxing), Mian Quan (soft boxing) or shisan shi (十三式, the thirteen techniques).
History and styles
There are five major styles of t‘ai-chi ch‘üan, each named after the Chinese family from which it originated:
- Chen-style (陳氏) of Chen Wangting (1580–1660)
- Yang-style (楊氏) of Yang Luchan (1799–1872)
- Wu- or Wu (Hao)-style (武氏) of Wu Yu-hsiang (1812–1880)
- Wu-style (吳氏) of Wu ch‘üan-yu (1834–1902) and his son Wu Chien-ch‘üan (1870–1942)
- Sun-style (孫氏) of Sun Lu-t’ang (1861–1932)
The order of verifiable age is as listed above. The order of popularity (in terms of number of practitioners) is Yang, Wu, Chen, Sun and Wu/Hao. The major family styles share much underlying theory, but differ in their approaches to training.
There are now dozens of new styles, hybrid styles, and offshoots of the main styles, but the five family schools are the groups recognized by the international community as being the orthodox styles. Other important styles are Zhaobao t‘ai-chi ch‘üan, a close cousin of Chen-style, which has been newly recognized by Western practitioners as a distinct style, the Fu style, created by Fu Chen Sung, which evolved from Chen, Sun and Yang styles, and also incorporates movements from Baguazhang (Pa Kua Chang) and the Cheng Man-ch’ing style which is a simplification of the traditional Yang style.

Differences between Chen, Yang and Wu styles
Chen-style is the original tai chi style. Yang-style was later derived from Chen, and Yang in turn spawned Wu-style. It is thus useful to compare the three.
Differences can be relatively minor and include the speed at which motions are performed, the order of poses, the size of the movements, and hand orientation. A larger difference is the way in which the movements are performed. For example, the form “Parting the wild horse’s mane” in Yang-style bears no resemblance to the same movement in Sun-style, and the Sun 73 forms can be performed in the same time as the Yang 24 forms Differences also exist within the same style: depending on the teacher’s lineage, Yang Short Form can be counted as 103, 108 or 122 separate poses.
Tempo
- Chen-style involves starting each move from a near-stationary position, punctuated by sudden bursts of speed and power to complete each movement.
- Yang and Wu styles are more-evenly paced and appear more fluid and continuous.
Size of movement
- Chen-style involves large movements where the limbs are extended a large distance from the body, and stances are deep (with knees and hips bent more).
- Wu-style is compact, keeping the hands close to the body, and the stance is high (knees and hips are bent less).
- Yang-style is intermediate between the two, though closer to Chen than to Wu.
Reasons for differences
Yang Luchan, founder of Yang-style, originally taught Chen-style as he had learned. Over time, he reasoned that when fighting, people did not adopt the deep stances taught—thus he raised the stance. Movements slowed as it was easier to speed-up a correct movement performed slowly than to increase precision in a fast movement.
Chen-style was developed for use against armoured opponents. Yang-style was developed when use of armour had decreased (and additional changes were introduced in the early 20th century by Yang Cheng Fu). Wu-style is even more remote from armour.
In order to make the style easier to learn, the Yang Short Form was developed which incorporates around 100 postures, as opposed to around 300 of the long form. New Zealand t‘ai-chi teacher Hu Loo-Chi (who taught Chen-style) said the 84 postures could be learnt in around 14 hours, though it would take a lifetime to master them.
Over time, unintentional differences may accumulate in the way a style is taught by a particular teacher or school. Periodically, some teachers may update or amend their teaching after studying with the current lineage holder or another teacher closer to the lineage holder. This serves to correct any errors that may have arisen in transmission of the style, as well as incorporating changes made by the current lineage holder. Without a formal system of accreditation or standardization, such refreshment is optional. This accumulation of errors as well as personal preference by the teacher accounts for variation in styles.
T‘ai-chi ch‘üan in the United States
Choy Hok Pang, a disciple of Yang Chengfu, was the first known proponent of t‘ai-chi ch‘üan to openly teach in the United States in 1939. Subsequently, his son and student Choy Kam Man emigrated to San Francisco from Hong Kong in 1949 to teach t‘ai-chi ch‘üan in San Francisco’s Chinatown. Choy Kam Man taught until he died in 1994.
Sophia Delza, a professional dancer and student of Ma Yueliang, performed the first known public demonstration of t‘ai-chi ch‘üan in the United States at the Museum of Modern Art in New York City in 1954. She also wrote the first English language book on t‘ai-chi, t‘ai-chi ch‘üan: Body and Mind in Harmony, in 1961. She taught regular classes at Carnegie Hall, the Actors Studio, and the United Nations.
Another early practitioner of t‘ai-chi ch‘üan to openly teach in the United States was Zheng Manqing, who opened his school Shr Jung t‘ai-chi after he moved to New York from Taiwan in year 1964. Unlike the older generation of t‘ai-chi practitioners, Zheng was cultured and educated in American ways, and thus he was able to transcribe Yang’s dictation into a written manuscript that became the de facto manual for Yang style t‘ai-chi. Zheng felt Yang’s traditional 108-movement Long Form was unnecessarily long and repetitive, which makes it difficult to learn and make progress. He thus created a shortened 37-movement version and taught that in his schools. Zheng’s form became very popular and was the dominant form in the New York-Philadelphia-Washington DC corridor until other teachers started to emigrate to the United States in larger numbers in the 90’s. He taught until his death in 1975.
T‘ai-chi ch‘üan lineage tree
Note:
- This lineage tree is not comprehensive, but depicts those considered the “gate-keepers” and most recognised individuals in each generation of the respective styles.
- Although many styles were passed down to respective descendants of the same family, the lineage focused on is that of the martial art and its main styles, not necessarily that of the families.
- Each (coloured) style depicted below has a lineage tree on its respective article page that is focused on that specific style, showing a greater insight into the highly significant individuals in its lineage.
- Names denoted by an asterisk are legendary or semi-legendary figures in the lineage; while their involvement in the lineage is accepted by most of the major schools, it is not independently verifiable from known historical records.
Key: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Solid lines | Direct teacher-student. | (张三丰) Zhang Sanfeng* c. 12th century NEIJIA |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dashed lines | Individual(s) omitted. | Various Daoists | Legendary figures | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dotted lines | Partial influence /taught informally /limited time. |
(王宗岳) Wang Zongyue* TAIJIQUAN |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dashed cross | Branch continues. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(陈王庭) Chen Wangting 1580–1660 CHEN-STYLE |
(蒋法) Jiang Fa Zhaobao-style |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(陈汝信) Chen Ruxin 2nd gen. Chen |
(陈所乐) Chen Suole 2nd gen. Chen |
(邢喜怀) Xing Xihuai 2nd gen. Zhaobao |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(陈大鹍) Chen Dakun 3rd gen. Chen |
(陈大鹏) Chen Dapeng 3rd gen. Chen |
(陈光印) Chen Guangyin 3rd gen. Chen |
(陈申如) Chen Shenru 3rd gen. Chen |
(陈恂如) Chen Xunru 3rd gen. Chen |
(陈正如) Chen Zhengru 3rd gen. Chen |
(张楚臣) Zhang Chuchen 3rd gen. Zhaobao |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(陈善通) Chen Shantong 4th gen. Chen |
(陈善志) Chen Shanzhi 4th gen. Chen |
(陈继夏) Chen Jixia 4th gen. Chen |
(陈节) Chen Jie 4th gen. Chen |
(陈敬伯) Chen Jingbo 4th gen. Chen 4th gen. Zhaobao |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(陈秉奇) Chen Bingqi 5th gen. Chen |
(陈秉壬) Chen Bingren 5th gen. Chen |
(陈秉旺) Chen Bingwang 1748–? 5th gen. Chen |
(陈公兆) Chen Gongzhao 1715– after1795 5th gen. Chen |
(张宗禹) Zhang Zongyu 5th gen. Zhaobao |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(陈长兴) Chen Changxing 1771–1853 6th gen. Chen Chen Old Frame |
(陈有本) Chen Youben c. 19th century 6th gen. Chen Chen Small Frame |
(张彦) Zhang Yan 6th gen. Zhaobao |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(陈耕耘) Chen Gengyun 7th gen. Chen |
(杨露禅) Yang Luchan 1799–1872 YANG-STYLE Guang Ping Yang Yangjia Michuan |
(陈清萍) Chen Qingping 1795–1868 7th gen. Chen 7th gen. Zhaobao |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(陈延熙) Chen Yanxi 8th gen. Chen |
(王兰亭) Wang Lanting 1840–? 2nd gen. Yang |
(杨健侯) Yang Jianhou 1839–1917 2nd gen. Yang 2nd gen. Yangjia Michuan |
(杨班侯) Yang Banhou 1837–1892 2nd gen. Yang 2nd gen. Guang Ping Yang Yang Small Frame |
(武禹襄) Wu Yuxiang 1812–1880 WU (HAO)-STYLE |
(他招远) He Zhaoyuan 1810–1890 8th gen. Zhaobao Zhaobao He-style |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(陈发科) Chen Fake 1887–1957 9th gen. Chen Chen New Frame |
(李瑞东) Li Ruidong 1851–1917 Li-style |
(杨澄甫) Yang Chengfu 1883–1936 3rd gen. Yang Yang Big Frame |
(杨少侯) Yang Shaohou 1862–1930 3rd gen. Yang Yang Small Frame |
(吴全佑) Wu Quanyou 1834–1902 1st gen. Wu |
(王矯宇) Wang Jiaoyu 1836–1939 3rd gen. Guang Ping Yang |
(李亦畬) Li Yiyu 1832–1892 2nd gen. Wu (Hao) |
(和庆喜) He Qingxi 1857–1936 9th gen. Zhaobao |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(陈照丕) Chen Zhaopi 1893–1972 10th gen. Chen focused on Chen Old Frame |
(陈照奎) Chen Zhaokui 1928–1981 10th gen. Chen focused on Chen New Frame |
(張欽霖) Zhang Qinlin 1888–1967 3rd gen. Yangjia Michuan |
(杨振铎) Yang Zhenduo b. 1926 4th gen. Yang |
(傅仲文) Fu Zhongwen 1903–1994 4th gen. Yang Beijing (24) form |
(郑曼青) Zheng Manqing 1902–1975 4th gen. Yang Short (37) Form |
(吴鉴泉) Wu Jianquan 1870–1942 2nd gen. Wu WU-STYLE 108 Form |
Kuo Lien Ying 1895–1984 4th gen. Guang Ping Yang |
(郝為真) Hao Weizhen 1849–1920 3rd gen. Wu (Hao) |
(郑悟清) Zheng Wuqing 1895–1984 10th gen. Zhaobao |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(吴公儀) Wu Gongyi 1900–1970 3rd gen. Wu |
(孙禄堂) Sun Lutang 1861–1932 SUN-STYLE |
(郝月如) Hao Yueru 1877–1935 4th gen. Wu (Hao) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(王延年) Wang Yannian 1914–2008 5th gen. Yang 4th gen. Yangjia Michuan |
(鄭天熊) Zheng Tianxiong 1930–2005 Wudang-style |
(吴雁霞) Wu Yanxia 1930–2001 4th gen. Wu |
(孙剑云) Sun Jianyun 1913–2003 2nd gen. Sun |
(郝少如) Hao Shaoru 1908–1983 5th gen. Wu (Hao) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(陈小旺) Chen Xiaowang b. 1945 11th gen. Chen |
(陈小星) Chen Xiaoxing b. 1952 11th gen. Chen |
(杨军) Yang Jun b. 1968 5th gen. Yang |
(吴光宇) Wu Guangyu b. 1946 5th gen. Wu |
(孙永田) Sun Yongtian b. ? 3rd gen. Sun |
(刘积顺) Liu Jishun b. 1930 6th gen. Wu (Hao) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CHEN-STYLE | YANG-STYLE | WU-STYLE | SUN-STYLE | WU (HAO)-STYLE | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Modern forms
The Cheng Man-ch‘ing (Zheng Manqing) and Chinese Sports Commission short forms are derived from Yang family forms, but neither is recognized as Yang family t‘ai-chi ch‘üan by standard-bearing Yang family teachers. The Chen, Yang, and Wu families are now promoting their own shortened demonstration forms for competitive purposes.
(杨澄甫) Yang Chengfu 1883–1936 3rd gen. Yang Yang Big Frame |
|||||||||||||
(郑曼青) Zheng Manqing 1902–1975 4th gen. Yang Short (37) Form |
Chinese Sports Commission 1956 Beijing (24) Form |
||||||||||||
1989 42 Competition Form (Wushu competition form combined from Chen, Yang, Wu & Sun styles) |
|||||||||||||
T‘ai-chi ch‘üan today

As a result of this popularity, there has been some divergence between those that say they practice t‘ai-chi ch‘üan primarily for self-defence, those that practice it for its aesthetic appeal (see wushu below), and those that are more interested in its benefits to physical and mental health. The wushu aspect is primarily for show; the forms taught for those purposes are designed to earn points in competition and are mostly unconcerned with either health maintenance or martial ability. More traditional stylists believe the two aspects of health and martial arts are equally necessary: the yin and yang of t‘ai-chi ch‘üan. The t‘ai-chi ch‘üan “family” schools, therefore, still present their teachings in a martial art context, whatever the intention of their students in studying the art.
T‘ai-chi ch‘üan as sport
In order to standardize t‘ai-chi ch‘üan for wushu tournament judging, and because many t‘ai-chi ch‘üan teachers have either moved out of China or had been forced to stop teaching after the Communist regime was established in 1949, the government sponsored the Chinese Sports Committee, who brought together four of their wushu teachers to truncate the Yang family hand form to 24 postures in 1956. They wanted to retain the look of t‘ai-chi ch‘üan, but create a routine that would be less difficult to teach and much less difficult to learn than longer (in general, 88 to 108 posture), classical, solo hand forms. In 1976, they developed a slightly longer form also for the purposes of demonstration that still would not involve the complete memory, balance, and coordination requirements of the traditional forms. This became the Combined 48 Forms that were created by three wushu coaches, headed by Men Hui Feng. The combined forms were created based on simplifying and combining some features of the classical forms from four of the original styles: Chen, Yang, Wu, and Sun. As t‘ai-chi ch‘üan again became popular on the mainland, more competitive forms were developed to be completed within a six-minute time limit. In the late 1980s, the Chinese Sports Committee standardized many different competition forms. They developed sets to represent the four major styles as well as combined forms. These five sets of forms were created by different teams, and later approved by a committee of wushu coaches in China. All sets of forms thus created were named after their style, e.g., the “Chen-style national competition form” is the 56 Forms, and so on. The combined forms are The 42-Form or simply the Competition Form. Another modern form is the “97 movements combined t‘ai-chi ch‘üan form”, created in the 1950s; it contains characteristics of the Yang, Wu, Sun, Chen, and Fu styles blended into a combined form. The wushu coach Bow Sim Mark is a notable exponent of the “67 combined form”.
These modern versions of t‘ai-chi ch‘üan (often listed as the pinyin romanization “taijiquan” among practitioners, teachers and masters) have since become an integral part of international wushu tournament competition, and have been featured in popular movies, starring or choreographed by well-known wushu competitors, such as Jet Li and Donnie Yen.
In the 11th Asian Games of 1990, wushu was included as an item for competition for the first time with the 42-Form being chosen to represent t‘ai-chi ch‘üan. The International Wushu Federation (IWUF) applied for wushu to be part of the Olympic games, but will not count medals.
Practitioners also test their practical martial skills against students from other schools and martial arts styles in tuishou (pushing hands) and sanshou competition.
Philosophy
The philosophy of t‘ai-chi ch‘üan is that, if one uses hardness to resist violent force, then both sides are certainly to be injured at least to some degree. Such injury, according to t‘ai-chi ch‘üan, is a natural consequence of meeting brute force with brute force. Instead, students are taught not to directly fight or resist an incoming force, but to meet it in softness and follow its motion while remaining in physical contact until the incoming force of attack exhausts itself or can be safely redirected, meeting yang with yin. When done correctly, this yin/yang or yang/yin balance in combat, or in a broader philosophical sense, is a primary goal of t‘ai-chi ch‘üan training. Lao Tzŭ provided the archetype for this in the Tao Te Ching when he wrote, “The soft and the pliable will defeat the hard and strong.”
Traditional schools also emphasize that one is expected to show wude (“martial virtue/heroism”), to protect the defenseless, and show mercy to one’s opponents.
Training and techniques
The core training involves two primary features: the first being taolu (solo “forms”), a slow sequence of movements which emphasize a straight spine, abdominal breathing and a natural range of motion; the second being different styles of tuishou (“pushing hands”) for training movement principles of the form with a partner and in a more practical manner.
Forms
- 8-form tai chi chuan
- 24-form tai chi chuan
- 42-form tai chi chuan
Solo (taolu, neigong and qigong)

Breathing exercises; neigong (internal skill) or, more commonly, qigong (life energy cultivation) are practiced to develop qi (life energy) in coordination with physical movement and zhan zhuang (standing like a post) or combinations of the two. These were formerly taught only to disciples as a separate, complementary training system. In the last 60 years they have become better known to the general public.
Qigong versus t‘ai-chi ch‘üan
Qigong involves coordinated movement, breath, and awareness used for health, meditation, and martial arts training. While many scholars and practitioners consider t‘ai-chi ch‘üan to be a type of qigong, the two are commonly distinguished as separate but closely related practices, with qigong playing an important role in training for t‘ai-chi ch‘üan, and with many t‘ai-chi ch‘üan movements performed as part of qigong practice. The focus of qigong is typically more on health or meditation than martial applications. Internally the main difference is the flow of Qi, In qigong the flow of Qi is held at a gate point for a moment to aid the opening and cleansing of the channels. In Taiji the flow of Qi is continuous, thus allowing the development of Power for the use by the practitioner, thus the differences between postures, i.e.: no straighting of joint in Taiji.
Partnered (tuishou and sanshou)

In addition to the physical form, martial t‘ai-chi ch‘üan schools also focus on how the energy of a strike affects the other person. A palm strike that looks to have the same movement may be performed in such a way that it has a completely different effect on the target’s body. A palm strike that could simply push the opponent backward, could instead be focused in such a way as to lift the opponent vertically off the ground, breaking his/her centre of gravity; or that it could terminate the force of the strike within the other person’s body with the intent of causing internal damage.
Most aspects of a trainee’s t‘ai-chi ch‘üan development are meant to be covered within the partnered practice of tuishou, and so, sanshou (sparring) is not as commonly used as a method of training, but more advanced students sometimes do practice by sanshou. Sanshou is more common to tournaments such as wushu tournaments.
Weapons

Variations of t‘ai-chi ch‘üan involving weapons also exist such as taijijian. The weapons training and fencing applications employ:
- the jian, a straight double-edged sword, practiced as taijijian;
- the dao, a heavier curved saber, sometimes called a broadsword;
- the tieshan, a folding fan, also called shan and practiced as taijishan;
- the gun, a 2m long wooden staff and practiced as taijigun;
- the qiang, a 2m long spear or a 4m long lance.
- the large dadao and podao sabres;
- the ji, or halberd;
- the cane;
- the sheng biao, or rope dart;
- the sanjiegun, or three sectional staff;
- the feng huo lun, or wind and fire wheels;
- the lasso;
- the whip, chain whip and steel whip.
Health

A 2011 comprehensive overview of all the existing systematic reviews of t‘ai-chi ch‘üan’s health effects found that “the evidence is conclusively or tentatively positive for fall prevention, general healthcare in older people, improving balance and enhancing psychological health”; the overview’s authors thus recommended t‘ai-chi ch‘üan to older people for its various physical and psychological benefits. There was no conclusive evidence of benefit for any of the other conditions researched, including Parkinson’s disease, diabetes, cancer and arthritis.
A 2015 systematic review found Tai Chi could be performed by those with chronic medical conditions such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, and osteoarthritis without worsening shortness of breath and pain, and found favorable effects on functional exercise capacity in people with these conditions.
In 2015 the Australian Government’s Department of Health published the results of a review of alternative therapies that sought to determine if any were suitable for being covered by health insurance; t‘ai-chi was one of 17 therapies evaluated for which no clear evidence of effectiveness was found.
Historic and legendary confrontations

- In the 1940s, a man known as “Big Spear Liu” came to Shanghai’s “big world,” the city’s major performance and entertainment centre. Liu asked the doorkeeper, “Are there any good hands around here?” In other words, he was seeking someone considered highly skilled in martial art in order to make a challenge. The doorkeeper told “Big Spear Liu” of Tian Zhaolin (student of Yang Jianhou). With that Liu set off to find him. He found Tian Zhaolin and immediately demanded to spar by each striking the other three times, to which Tian Zhaolin responded that it may not be necessary. He said, “Just let me touch you. If you can tolerate my touch, you win.” Liu, sensing a fool and an effortless victory, immediately agreed. The two men approached and Tian Zhaolin reached out his hand to touch Liu’s chest. Within a few moments, Liu’s facial muscles started to contort. Soon he grimaced and his face showed signs of intense pain. Spear Liu pulled away and, after recovering, commented, “I have travelled throughout five provinces and various cities but until today I have never seen such a profound skill.” Energy, including that of taijiquan, may be thought of as transmission by wave. Earlier generation adepts in taijiquan had an expression—”hitting the cow on this side of the Mountain.” This phrase referred to hitting an opponent’s front side with the pain and effect being felt on the back side. In years past, people who sparred with Yang Shaohou often described him as also having an energy like electricity. That is, it caused very painful sensations in the muscle and even on the skin surface. Tian Zhaolin, coming from that background, also knew this method.
- In 1945, Hu Yuen Chou, a student of Yang Chengfu, defeated a Russian boxer by TKO in a full-contact match in Fut San, China.
- At the age of 60, Huang Sheng Shyan demonstrated his abilities in taijiquan by defeating Liao Kuang-Cheng, the Asian champion wrestler, 26 throws to 0 in a fund raising event in Kuching, Malaysia.
Attire and ranking

There is no standardized t‘ai-chi ch‘üan ranking system, except the Chinese Wushu Duan wei exam system run by the Chinese wushu association in Beijing. However, most schools do not use belt rankings. Some schools may present students with belts depicting rank, similar to dans in Japanese martial arts. A simple uniform element of respect and allegiance to one’s teacher and their methods and community, belts also mark hierarchy, skill, and accomplishment of practice in one school’s style and system. During wushu tournaments, masters and grandmasters often wear “kung fu uniforms” which tend to have no belts. Wearing a belt signifying rank in such a situation would be unusual.
Tai Chi as a generic brand

A new phenomenon (since the 2000s) is of various martial arts styles claiming a historical relationship or otherwise with Taiji Quan, because of its popularity. A branch of Lama Pai known as ‘Tibetan White Crane’ had popularized a slow-movement form by naming it ‘Needle in Cotton’ (a common term describing Taiji Quan mechanics), and referring to its practice as ‘Tai Chi’. However, there is no relationship between these arts, historic or otherwise. A similar phenomenon occurs with the usage of the art’s name as a universal brand for promoting various fitness programs, books and videos. There is, for instance, a book that describes how to use the training principles of Tai Chi to run better. Regardless of the questions of whether such claims are viable, these are all new trends, which historically were not endorsed or promoted by teachers of the art.